ChengRang

MiniCPM-OCR 1.0

AI Productivity Open Source

OpenBMB's Apache 2.0 document recognition suite released 2026/10/27, pairing a 1.3B parser with the 2B Jev quality model that scores text, formulas and tables from 0 to 1, with 93.68 on Real5-OmniDocBench

OpenBMBOCRdocument parsingopen sourceApache 2.0
Visit MiniCPM-OCR 1.0

Disclaimer: Review content represents our editorial team's views and experience, not commercial recommendation or investment advice. Product info and pricing may change; refer to official sources.

Overview

MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 is a document recognition suite OpenBMB open-sourced on October 27, 2026 under Apache 2.0, with code and weights released together. It contains two models: MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 at 1.3 billion parameters handles parsing, and MiniCPM-OCR Jev at 2 billion parameters handles quality control.

The split is the distinctive part. Most OCR returns one block of text and leaves you to find the mistakes. Jev scores each region of a parse from 0 to 1, evaluating text, formulas and tables separately, so only low-scoring regions reach a human review queue. Jev is not tied to its sibling: OpenBMB measured it over results from MiniCPM-OCR, GLM-OCR, PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 and Xiaomi OCR-0, with AUROC between 91.9 and 93.4.

On the parsing side the scores are 93.68 on Real5-OmniDocBench and 54.7 on OCRBench v2. DSpark decoding lifts end-to-end efficiency by 55 percent, putting throughput at roughly 1.49 times PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 and 3.62 times MinerU2.5 Pro, about 1.2 pages per second on an RTX 5090. Day-one support covers vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp and Ollama, with BF16, GGUF, AWQ and GPTQ weights.

Key Features

Use Cases

Pros

Pricing

Apache 2.0 across code, documentation and weights, with no extra commercial restriction. Self-hosting carries only hardware cost, and OpenBMB measures about 1.2 pages per second on an RTX 5090, with real throughput depending on backend, concurrency and page content. Online demos are available for both China and global users to test on real documents, and any hosted service bills according to its own platform.

Summary

The value here is admitting that OCR gets things wrong and marking where. Most teams do not lose to a percentage point of accuracy, they lose because nobody knows which cell on which page needs a human, so they either review everything or wait for a downstream failure. Jev turns that into a score plus a threshold that fits into an existing pipeline. Parsing speed and runtime support are adequate, and a 1.3B footprint makes local deployment realistic.

Version History

Category
AI Productivity
Pricing
Open Source
Tags
OpenBMB · OCR · document parsing
Website

Related Tools